JHAGARSAI and ORS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS
ACQA/3/2012 · 2025-10-30
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57913 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57913 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:53357
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 03 of 2012
1. Jhagarsai, aged about 47 years, S/o Nanka Bijhiya,
2. Dujobai, aged about 59 years, W/o Nanka,
3. Tifful, aged about 37 years, S/o Nanka Ram,
4. Fuleshwari, W/o Tikumram, aged about 37 years, All are R/o Village Kandrai, P.S. Jainagar, District – Surguja (C.G.)
... Appellants versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Jainagar, District – Surguja (C.G.)
2. Jeetu Ram, aged about 42 years, S/o Late Kanwal Sai,
3. Jaggu Ram @ Jagmohan, S/o Kanwal Sai, aged about 39 years,
4. Aienee Bai, aged about 65 years, W/o Kanwal Sai,
5. Susheela Bai, W/o Jagmohan, aged about 37 years, No.2 to 5 are R/o Village Kandrai, P.S. Jainagar, District – Sarguja (C.G.)
... Respondents For Appellants : None For Respondents No.1/State : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 31.10.2025
1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round of PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.10.31 16:40:35 +0530
2 hearing. Also on 29.10.2025 and 30.10.2025 no one appeared for appellants.
2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Prakash