1 2025:CGHC:52993 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 191 of 2015 1 - Deena Nath Sao S/o Shri Chhattu Sao Aged About 43 Years R/o Heera Nagar Mitthumuda, Raigarh, P.S. And Tahsil- Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Hon’ble Court Order Dated- 01-05-2025. 1.1 - Vimala Jaiswal (Died) As Per Hon’ble Court Order Dated- 01-05-2025. 1.2 - Navin Jaiswal S/o Late Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal Aged About 42 Years R/o Heera Nagar (Mithumuda), Durga Chauk, Raigarh, Tah. And Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 1.3 - Ravindra Jaiswal S/o Late Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal Aged About 40 Years R/o Heera Nagar (Mithumuda), Durga Chauk, Raigarh, Tah. And Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 1.4 - Radha Jaiswal D/o Late Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal Aged About 38 Years W/o Shri Sanjay Jaiswal, R/o Heera Nagar (Mithumuda), Durga Chauk, Raigarh, Tah. And Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 1.5 - Krishna Jaiswal (Died) As Per Hon’ble Court Order Dated - 01-05-2025. 1.5.1 - Rajesh Jaiswal S/o Lallu Lal Jaiswal Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 35, Heera Nagar Mithumuda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 1.5.2 - Ku. Shubhi Jaiswal D/o Rajesh Jaiswal Aged About 11 Years Represented Through Legal Guardian Rajesh Jaiswal, Aged About 44 Years, S/o Lallu Lal Jaiswal, R/o Ward No. 35, Heera Nagar Mithumuda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 1.6 - Shailendra Jaiswal S/o Late Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal Aged About 35 Years R/o Heera Nagar (Mithumuda), Durga Chauk, Raigarh, Tah. And Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.31 11:15:35 +0530 2 For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shahid Ahmed Ansari, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30/10/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have jointly submitted that, the parties have entered into compromise and they have mutually partitioned the subject property. They have also filed an application before the Tahsildar, Raigarh for separation of holdings in compliance of the order dated 28.08.2025 and the Tahsildar, Raigarh has also passed an order on 30.09.2025 with respect to partition of holdings of the parties, and therefore, the parties do not want to prosecute the present second appeal and it may be disposed of. 2. On due consideration upon the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present second appeal is disposed of, as per their terms of compromise and the partition of holdings of their respective shares. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved