CRM-M-14574 IN T 398-1 MANPREET S STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present: Ms Mr for Mr Mr for RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Suraksha Sanh 24.06.2025 U/s 2023 Police Sta FIR No.126 dat 351(3), 191(3), BNS) Police S subsequent p compromise/set 14574-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da EET SINGH AND OTHERS Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Ms. Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate and Mr. J.S. Mahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sukhbir Maandi, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 5. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Se Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quash 5 U/s 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), ice Station Beas, District Amritsar (R 26 dated 22.06.2025, under Sections 1 91(3), 190 of B.N.S., 2023 (lateron lice Station Beas, District Amritsar nt proceedings arising therefr ise/settlement dated 27.01.2026 (Anne PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-14574-2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL te and der Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik quashing of Rapat No. 37 dated 26(2), 351(3), 191 (3), 190 of BNS, tsar (Rural) (Annexure P-1) in case tions 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), teron added offence U/s 118(2) of ritsar (Rural) (Annexure P-2) and therefrom on the basis of (Annexure P-3). s ents garik ated NS, case 6(2), 2) of and of GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-14574 2. Th to appear befor and the learned of the comprom 3. Pur Sub-Divisional statements reco Divisional Judic 03.04.2026 to t parties voluntar 4. Lea and 5 have not d 5. In continue with 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this 115(2), 118(1), Station Beas, D dated 22.06.202 191(3), 190 of B Station Beas, 14574-2026 2 This Court vide order dated 18.03 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to arned Magistrate was directed to send promise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa sional Judicial Magistrate, Baba B s recorded. On the basis of the s l Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sa to the effect that the compromise h luntarily and without any coercion or u Learned State counsel as well as e not disputed the factum of comprom In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and Rapat 18(1), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3), 191 ( eas, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annex .06.2025, under Sections 115(2), 11 90 of B.N.S., 2023 (lateron added offe eas, District Amritsar (Rural) (An 18.03.2026 had directed the parties rate to get their statements recorded o send its report qua the genuineness er, parties have appeared before the aba Bakala Sahib and got their the statements so recorded, Sub- ala Sahib has submitted report dated mise has been effected between the ion or undue influence. ell as counsel for respondent No.2 promise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon’ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Rapat No. 37 dated 24.06.2025 U/s 191 (3), 190 of BNS, 2023 Police (Annexure P-1) in case FIR No.126 2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3), d offence U/s 118(2) of BNS) Police ) (Annexure P-2) and subsequent rties rded ness e the their - ated n the No.2 d to ment nd ble 10 U/s olice .126 1(3), olice ent GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-14574 proceedings ari 27.01.2026 (An 7. Pen of, accordingly. 07.04.2026 Gurpreet 14574-2026 3 gs arising therefrom on the basis of 6 (Annexure P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No sis of compromise/settlement dated lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No ated osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.