Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57906 (CAL)

DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LTD. v. GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR.

IPDTMA/20/2024 · 2025-06-11

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UL IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE (Intellectual Property Rights Division) IPDTMA/14/2024 DUNLOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/15/2024 DUNLOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/16/2024 DUNLOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/17/2024 DUNLOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENTS LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/18/2024 DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LTD. VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/19/2024 DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LTD. VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. IPDTMA/20/2024 DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LTD. VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENT LIMITED AND ANR. 2 IPDTMA/21/2024 DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LTD. VS GLORIOUS INVESTMENTS LIMITED AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 16th June, 2025. Appearance: Mr. Siddhartha Lahiri, Adv. Ms. Sanjukta Gupta, Adv. Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Mary Dutta, Adv. Ms. Madhu Jana, Adv. Mr. Dhrub Surana, Adv. …for the Registrar The Court: By consent of the parties, the matter is treated as on the Day’s List. It is submitted on behalf of the Advocates appearing for the respondent no. 2 i.e. Registrar of Trade Mark that due to inadvertence their names were not recorded in the judgment dated 11th June, 2025. By consent of the parties the following names are added as the Advocates who represented the respondent no. 2 Controller:- Mr. Siddhartha Lahiri, Advocate, Ms. Sanjukta Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Advocate, Ms. Mary Dutta, Advocate, Ms. Madhu Jana, Advocate and Mr. Dhrub Surana, Advocate. Let the above corrections be incorporated in the judgment dated 11th June, 2025. The concerned Department is directed to do the needful. (RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) S.Bag