Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 579 (CHH)

LEKH RAM SAHU v. SAMRESH ASHISH BENARJI

MAC/1489/2019 · 2026-07-06

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21164 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1488 of 2019 1 - Leman Sahu S/o Som Lal Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Ward No. 1, Ahiwara, Kranti Chowk Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Appellant versus 1 - Samresh Ashish Benarji S/o Late A. K. Benarji Aged About 42 Years R/o Gandhi Nagar Bhilai - 3, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Driver And Owner). 2 - Manager The New India Insurance Company Limited, Chouhan Estate Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Insurer). --- Respondents MAC No. 1489 of 2019 1 - Lekh Ram Sahu S/o Ganpat Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Ahiwara Kranti Chowk, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Khilendra Sahu S/o Lekh Ram Sahu Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Ahiwara Kranti Chowk, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Dipika Sahu D/o Lekh Ram Sahu Aged About 19 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Ahiwara Kranti Chowk, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. ---Appellants Versus Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.05.08 17:21:53 +0530 2 1 - Samresh Ashish Benarji S/o Late A. K. Benarji, Aged About 42 Years R/o Gandhi Nagar Bhilai - 3, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Driver And Owner). (Driver of Offending Vehicle Indica Vista No. CG - 07, M.B. - 1372 ). 2 - Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Chouhan Estate Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Indica Vista No. C G - 07, M.B. - 1372). --- Respondents For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 08 / 05 /202 5 1. On 24.04.2025 and today also no one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) and respondents even in the second round. It appears that the appellant(s) is/are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant(s), this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu