IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 221 CWP-17156-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025. V.S. NAGENDRA REDDY B. ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, for respondent No.2/NIT Kurukshetra. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Challenge raised in the instant petition is to the impugned proceedings of the minutes of meeting of Board of Governors in 44th meeting held on 05.02.2018 vis-à-vis Agenda Item No.44.11 and 44.12. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has already been selected against the said post, hence, the instant writ petition has technically been rendered infructuous. 3 Ordered accordingly. May 12, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.12 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document