Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57894 (AP)

J RAMAKRISHNA v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/23011/2021 · 2025-10-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010378142021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23011/2021 Between: 1. J RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65YEARS D.NO. 19-2-77 NIMKAM PALLI ROAD, YELLAMMAGUDI STREET, HINDUPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR,ANALITAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GORANTLA POLICE STATION,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. A NARAYANAPPA, S/O A.VENKATARAMAPPA, GUMMAIAHGARI PALLI VILLAGE, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. C LAKSHMAMMA, W/O C.THIMMAIAHGARI RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 50YCARS, D.NO. 1-215,CHALLAPALLI VILLAGE, SOMANDEPALLE MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not providing police protection to the petitioner from the hands of the respondents 4 and 5 in respect of the land being an extent of Ac 0.25 cents out of Ac 2.00cents in Sy no. 72-1 situated at Gorantla revenue village and mandal, Anantapuram District as illegal arbitrary and violation of article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide the police protection to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner form the hands of the respondents 4 and 5 by considering the representation dated 08..08.2021 made by the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23011 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not providing police protection to the petitioner from the hands of the respondents 4 and 5 in respect of the land being an extent of Ac 0.25 cents out of Ac 2.00cents in Sy no. 72-1 situated at Gorantla revenue village and mandal, Anantapuram District as illegal arbitrary and violation of article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide the police protection to the petitioner and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri P. Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that the petitioner has not approached the police seeking any relief. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation as and when required. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation to the police and the police 4 are directed to consider the same according to law, so long as the injunction Order is in the favour of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23011 of 2025 Dated.28.10.2025 UPS 170