Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57889 (PNJ)

MAMTA RANI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4928/2025 · 2025-05-19

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4928-2025 DECIDED ON: 19.05.2025 MAMTA RANI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been invoked for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents No.5 and 6 to produce and hand over the custody of minor daughter of the petitioner namely Mayra, who is illegally detained by respondents No.5 & 6 (Jeth Jethani of the petitioner) with a further prayer to appoint a warrant officer for search of the minor girl. In compliance to the order dated 14.05.2025 report of warrant officer has been received. Perusal of the report reveals that the detenue has been handed over to the petitioner and statement of petitioner recorded in which she stated that she is going home alongwith her daughter and father. MEENU 2025.05.20 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4928-2025 -2- The relevant part of the said report read as under:- “I along with petitioner, her father and police party reached the premises of respondent Nos 5 and 6. Respondent No. 5 to 8 were present there. Petitioner pointed out towards a girl and said she is her daughter Mayra (detenue). Seeing the petitioner, detenue came towards her and hugged her. She was looking happy with her mother. On my asking she said that she is happy with her mother and will live with her. Thereafter, we came back to police station. Detenue was handed over to petitioner. Statement of petitioner (Annexure R-1) was recorded in which she stated that she is going home along with her daughter and father.” In the light of above, this Court is of the view that no further inference of this Court is called for Accordingly, the petition is disposed off, having been rendered infructuous. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 19.05.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.20 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document