IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47712 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2023 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Munna Sahni S/O Ghosh Sahni @ Ghocha Sahni Resident of village- Ismaila, P.S.- Rajepur, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 10-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 342 of 2025 (arising out of Rajepur P.S. Case No. 161 of 2023) in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 34 of the IPC. 3. The informant is mother of the deceased. Marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the petitioner in the year 2023. As per allegation, the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, along with other named accused persons tortured her and committed her murder due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. On getting the information, when informant went to matrimonial house of her daughter, the accused persons were Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47712 of 2025(4) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 not there. They stealthily cremated her dead body. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is under incarceration since 21.08.2024 and no witness has been examined as yet. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the charge has been framed on 09.06.2025. The deceased was done to death in her matrimonial house within only two months of her marriage and her dead body was cremated stealthily without giving information to her parents. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve privilege of bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T