APHC010509912015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35394/2015 Between: 1. M/S BECO LIFTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR G.RAVI S/O YELLOJI AGED 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 33-14-317/1 FLOLOR, MAIN ROAD ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATAM-530 004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING) VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, PROJECT DIVISION CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT, PROJECT OFFICE A- BLOCK, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 031, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECT CONTRACTS) 2. THE SENIOR MANAGERMEIC, RINL/ VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, PROJECT DIVISION CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT, PROJECT OFFICE, A-BLOCK, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 031. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent bearing Ref. VSP/CONT/E 096)/01/15/Proj (Contracts)/Elec/742 dt. 14-10-2015 directing the petitioner to vacate the site otherwise the petitioner will be expelled from the site and will be getting the left over work executed by another agency without properly considering the 2 JS,J W.P.No.35394/2015 request made by the petitioner for extension of time for 15 days for completion of the entire work, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 45484 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents herein to permit the petitioner to complete the left over work by suspending the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent bearing Ref. VSP/CONT/E (96)/01/15/Proj (Contracts)/Elec/742 dt. 14-10- 2015 by granting 15 days time, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 2. V RAVINDER RAO The Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.35394/2015 ORDER: As there was no representation for the petitioner on 23.09.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Orders”. Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. Perused the record. The cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.35394/2015 310 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35394/2015 Dated: 24.10.2025 KAS