Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57883 (AP)

KONDAPALLI BALAJI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28834/2025 · 2025-10-26

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010559372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 28834/2025 BETWEEN: 1. KONDAPALLI BALAJI, W/o. LATE KONDAPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 39 YEARS R/o. MANGISETTYGUDEM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE TAHSILDA, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents seeking eviction of the Petitioner from her land covered in R.S.N0.167/5C an extent of Ac.1.40 cts situated at Taduvai Village Jangreddygudem Mandal, Eluru District as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provision of Assignment Rules consequently direct the Respondents not to evict the Petitioner from schedule land covered in R.S.No.167/5C an extent of Ac.1.40 cts situated at Taduvai Village, Jangreddygudem Mandal, Eluru District without acquiring the land and without passing any orders against the Petitioner and to pass such other order or orders. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Mrs. Maheswari Meenige, learned counsel represented on behalf of learned counsel on record for the petitioner, and sought leave of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition and endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 27.10.2025 Harin 4 91 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 28834 OF 2025 Date: 27-10-2025 Harin