RATAN LAL DAROGA S/O SHRI RAMLAL DAROGA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1847/2025 · 2025-02-28
Sameer Jain
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5787 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5787 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8864] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1847/2025 Ratan Lal Daroga S/o Shri Ramlal Daroga, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Teelanju Tonk, Rajasthan-304502 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Office Of Zila Parishad Tonk, Through Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Malpura, District-Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Movil Jeenwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Parveen, Adv.for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 28/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon order dated 21.01.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1023/2025 titled as Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and has submitted that the present matter is of akin factual and legal issues. Thence, may be decided in light of the ratio passed therein.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents Ms. Sara Parveen on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG is unable to controvert that under the similar narrative, the relied upon matter is adjudicated.
[2025:RJ-JP:8864] (2 of 2) [CW-1847/2025]
3. Heard and considered.
4. Taking note of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, and the consensus drawn inter-se the parties, the present petition is allowed in terms of the ratio encapsulated in Dhanraj Meena (Supra). For the sake of convenience the relevant extract is reproduced herein below: However, liberty is granted to pass fresh orders by specifying the name of the Gram Panchayat where the incumbents are supposed to join after transfer in case, work exigency so warrants, in accordance with Section 89 of the Rajashtan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 read with the judgment in Kera Ram ibid.
5. Present petition is accordingly, allowed in above terms. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /396