Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5787 (BOM)

ATUL VIKRAM MUNDE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

WP/24/2025 · 2025-10-03

Shri Sachin S Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 909-CrWP-24-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2025 ATUL VIKRAM MUNDE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar APP for Respondent No.1 : Ms. Saie S. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke ... CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 03-10-2025 PER COURT:- 1. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner at length, when this Court was not inclined to entertain the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy available in law. 2. Accordingly, the criminal writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH] JUDGE rrd 2025:BHC-AUG:27585