Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80151 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16386 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunita Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh,Dinesh Kumar Maurya,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dinesh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material on record. 3. The vakalatnama of Sri Dharmendra Kumar Singh and Sri Dinesh Kumar Maurya are not on record which has been filed in the office on 14.05.2025. Office to trace out the same and place it on record and make a note in the order sheet about it. 4. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Sunita, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 218 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, registered at P.S. Manikpur, District Chitrakoot. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued as follows: (i) The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. (ii) The applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased Jyoti. (iii) The marriage of the deceased Jyoti was solemnized with Anoop Yadav son of the applicant on 20.05.2022. (iv) General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the applicant. (v) Postmortem examination report shows that the cause of death could not be ascertained and viscera was preserved which after examination aluminium phosphide poison was found in it. (vi) Anoop Yadav the husband of the deceased is in jail. (vii) The applicant has no criminal history as stated in para 34 of the affidavit and is in jail since 25.03.2025. (viii) The investigation in the matter has concluded and a charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant, Kailash Yadav the father-in-law and Anoop Yadav the husband whereas Prem Yadav the devar and Neelam the nand of the deceased have been exonerated by the Investigating Officer during investigation, para 17 of the affidavit has been placed before the Court. (ix) The applicant is a lady and she is entitled to the benefit of Section 437 Cr.P.C./480 BNSS. 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant and learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the applicant is named in the FIR and there are allegations against her. 7. After having heard learned counsels for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that the applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The cause of death could not be ascertained and viscera was preserved which after examination aluminium phosphide poison was found in it. Anoop Yadav the husband of the deceased is in jail. The applicant is a lady. Charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant. 8. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 9. Let the applicant Sunita, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever. ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she/he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her/him presence proclamation under section 84 BNSS, 2023 may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her/him, in accordance with law, under section 209 BNS, 2023. (v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS, 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her/him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against her/him under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant. 10. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. 11. The bail application is allowed. 12. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad