- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40348 WP No. 16954 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 16954 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI.M.NARASIMHA MADHAVA BHAT, S/O LATE MADHAVA VAMANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NEAR SRI VENKATRAMANA TEMPLE, MANAMPADI, MULKY POST, MANGALORE - 574 154. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAYAKA B VISHNU BATTA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI VENKATARAMAMNA TEMPLE, MULKY, MULKI - 574 154. 1(A) U VASANTHA SHENOY, S/O GUNDRAY SHENOY, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(B) T ACHUTA SHENOY, S/O LATE NARAHARI SHENOY, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(C) DAMODAR KUDVA, S/O LATE GANAPATHI KUDVA, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(D) M RAJESH PRABHU, Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40348 WP No. 16954 of 2021 S/O M GOVIND PRABHU, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(E) MOHANDAS PRABHU, S/O VITTAL PRABHU , MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(F) ATUL V KUDVA, S/O VASUDEV R KUDVA, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 1(G) NARASIMHA PAI, S/O LATE VENKATARAYA PAI, MAJOR, R/AT MULKY - 574 154. 2. SRI VENKATESH PRABHKAR BHAT, S/O LATE PRABHAKARA ACHUTHA BHAT , ADULT, R/AT NEAR S V TEMPLE, MULKI - 574 154. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADISH BALIGA N, ADVOCATE; R1(A), R1(C) TO R1(G); R2 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.19.8.2021 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE D.K. MANGALURU IN M.A.NO.13/2021 AND CONSEQUENTLY CONFIRM THE ORDER ON IA NO.II DTD.18.6.2021 PASSED BY THE III ADDL SENIOR CIVL JUDGE AND JMFC MANGALURU D.K. IN O.S.NO.54/2021 ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40348 WP No. 16954 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that O.S.No.54/2021 out of which the present writ petition arises has been already disposed of before the Trial Court and therefore, this petition does not survive for consideration. 2. Submission and memo is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7