- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29019 WP No. 25931 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 25931 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHANDANMAL JAIN S/O DHARAMCHAND JAIN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI. MUKESH KUMAR JAIN S/O SURAJMAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. SRI. JITENDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O SURAJMAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 4. SMT. HEMA DEVI JAIN W/O CHANDANMAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. SMT. SHOBHA JAIN W/O MUKESH KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. SMT. SANTOSH JAIN W/O JITENDRA KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT: SANGHVI NIVAS, NO.965, SHERKHAN LANE NAGARATHPET CROSS, BENGALURU-560 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VEDAVYASA BHAT.H., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29019 WP No. 25931 of 2024 AND: 1. SMT. K.LAKSHMI MURTHY W/O SRI. K.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, JAIN TEMPLE CROSS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 004. 2. SRI. K.ANANTH S/O SRI. K.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, JAIN TEMPLE CROSS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 004. 3. SRI. KEERTHI KUMAR JAIN S/O B.SOHANLAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.1010, NAGARTHPET MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.07.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29019 WP No. 25931 of 2024 appearance of counsel for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on 29.07.2025. It was also ordered that if none appears for the petitioners on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of earlier peremptory order, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8