JAI SINGH v. STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND ORS
OWP/1989/2018 · 2025-08-25
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: OWP No. 1989/2018
Jai Singh
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R- 1 & 2 Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for R- 3 & 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 25.08.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions from his client not to pursue the instant matter any further in terms of order dated 19.08.2025. However, he prays that liberty be granted to him to file fresh petition, if fresh cause of action is accrued. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 25.08.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 12 Mihul Singh 2025.08.28 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document