APHC010496542021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30275/2021 Between: 1. NEELAGIRI RAJENDHRA KUMAR,, S/O. LATE RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. TF3, SRI SAI RESIDENCY, WATER TANK ROAD, SKL COLONY, YENAMALAKUDURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. P. VENKATA SUBHAMAYI,, D/O. LATE VENKATA GOVINDA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 13/647-1, JAMMIDODDI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AT MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INAGUDURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. GARIKAPATI PRAMEELA RANI, W/O. HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED 61 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 20-62/2, GANDHI NAGAR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. GARIKAPATI HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 20-62/2, 2 GANDHI NAGAR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. PUPPALA VENKATA RAM, S/O. VENKATA THIRUPATII RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O. MUSTHAKHANPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. PUPPALA SEETHA VENKATA NAGA VARA LAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATA RAM, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. MUSTHAKHANPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. MR RAMESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC- STATION HOUSE OFFICER (INSPECTOR OF POLICE), INAGUDURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GODDINDLA UDAY PRAKASH REDDY 2. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30275 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in not taking action on the reports made by the petitioners dated 05.09.2021 sent through registered post with acknowledgment due on 06.09.2021 against the persons who demolished the compound wall, shed as well as a thatched house belongs to the petitioners with the help of the 3rd respondent police as illegal, arbitrary as well as abuse of power of police and also oppose to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the report made by the petitioners dated 05.09.2021 sent through registered post with acknowledgment due on 06.09.2021 by tacking action in accordance with law against the persons who involved in illegal activity in demolishing the structures of the petitioners in collusion with the 3rd respondent police forthwith and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30275 of 2021 Dated.27.10.2025 UPS 77