ASHOK KUMAR PRADHAN v. FAROOQ AHMED SHAH , COMM. SECY. P.H.E. , I AND FC DEPTT.
CPSW/684/2018 · 2025-05-14
Javed Iqbal Wani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5783 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5783 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. CPSW No. 684/2018 in
SWP No. 1233/2016 277/2018
Ashok Kumar Pradhan
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ayush Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate q
vs
Farooq Ahmed Shah, Comm. Secy. P.H.E, I and FC Deptt. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 14.05.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the compliance report filed by the respondent accompanied with the consideration order, the petitioner does not want to pursue the contempt petition and would seek liberty to assail the
consideration order. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings are closed with liberty as prayed for.
(Javed Iqbal Wani)
Judge Jammu 14.05.2025 Rahul Sharma S. No. 71