APHC010496512021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30311 OF 2021 Between: 1. S.Md. Abdul Muteeb @ Shaik Abdul Muteeb,, S/o S.Md. Abdul.Kareem, Muslim, Aged 32 Years, R/o D.No.6 Puram, Kadapa City, 1. The Superindent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kad 2. The Station House Officer, Kadapa I Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. Shaik Allipeeran, S/o Dasthagiri sab, Muslim, Aged about 71 years, Residing at D.No.15/161, Ameenpeer Road, Peda Bestha Veedhi, Kadapa, YSR.Kadapa District. 4. Raju Narasimha Reddy, S/o Penchal Reddy. aged about 50 years, Real Estate Business, R/o D.No.1/2426, AP Housing Board Colony, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in t circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased In view of the above, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 30311 OF 2021 1. S.Md. Abdul Muteeb @ Shaik Abdul Muteeb,, S/o S.Md. Abdul.Kareem, Muslim, Aged 32 Years, R/o D.No.6-1158, New D.No.14-1158, Sankara ...Petitioner AND 1. The Superindent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 2. The Station House Officer, Kadapa I Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR 3. Shaik Allipeeran, S/o Dasthagiri sab, Muslim, Aged about 71 years, Residing at D.No.15/161, Ameenpeer Road, Peda Bestha Veedhi, Kadapa, 4. Raju Narasimha Reddy, S/o Penchal Reddy. aged about 50 years, Real Estate Business, R/o D.No.1/2426, AP Housing Board Colony, Kadapa, YSR ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in t circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased In view of the above, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. S.Md. Abdul Muteeb @ Shaik Abdul Muteeb,, S/o S.Md. Abdul.Kareem, 1158, Sankara ...Petitioner 2. The Station House Officer, Kadapa I Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR 3. Shaik Allipeeran, S/o Dasthagiri sab, Muslim, Aged about 71 years, Residing at D.No.15/161, Ameenpeer Road, Peda Bestha Veedhi, Kadapa, 4. Raju Narasimha Reddy, S/o Penchal Reddy. aged about 50 years, Real Estate Business, R/o D.No.1/2426, AP Housing Board Colony, Kadapa, YSR ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased In view of the above, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 and 2 not taking any appropriate action against the Respondents 3 and 4 thrpogh petitioner Represention dt.30.11.2021 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violate of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the represention of the represention dt.30.11.2021 made by the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 & 4 to stop illegal construction in the petitioner's site in R.S.No.259/3 for an extent of 0.02 cents in Semonepuram, Kadapa Town, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the order dated 24-12-2021 passed in WP.No.30311 of 2021 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: KOLUSU RAVIKIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30311 OF 2021 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…pleased In view of the above, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 and 2 not taking any appropriate action against the Respondents 3 and 4 thrpogh petitioner Represention dt.30.11.2021 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violate of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the represention of the represention dt.30.11.2021 made by the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.….” 2. Heard Sri Kolusu Ravikiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri T.V. Manoj, learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no representation, along with a copy of the injunction order in favour of the petitioner in O.S.No.162 of 2011 on the file of the IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa, has been received from the petitioner. 4. Sri T.V. Manoj, learned counsel for the 4th respondent, is present. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by recording the said submission and granting liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation. 6. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the police as and when required, so long as the decree of permanent injunction in O.S.No.162 of 2011 on the file of the IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa, remains in force and in his favour. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 337 W.P.No.30311 of 2021 Dated: 27.10.2025 KKV