2025:JHHC:10048 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.119 of 2024 M/s. Vani Insulation Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the provisions of Indian Companies Act having its works at Holding No.1, Burmamines, Shop Area, P.O. & P.S. Burmamines, Town- Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum through its Authorised Signatory Hardeep Singh, aged about 65 years, Son of Karnail Singh, resident of Sidgora, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. …… Petitioner Versus 1. Tata Steel Ltd. having its Head Office at 24, Homi Modi Street, Fort Mumbai and its Works at Bistupur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur through its Managing Director T.V. Narendran, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of General office of Tata Steel, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Town- Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. 2. Tarun Daga, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Northern Town, Ρ.Ο. and P.S. Bistupur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Managing Director, Jamshedpur Utility Services Company Ltd. having its office at Northern Town, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, District-East Singhbhum. 3. V.P. Singh son of not known to the petitioner, General Manager, JUSCO having its office at JUSCO, Northern Town Bistupur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. …... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S. L. Agarwal, Advocate Ms. Ayushi, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. M. S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate Mr. Yashdeep Kanhai, Advocate Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate Ms. Amrita Singh, Advocate -------- 08/Dated: 02 nd April, 2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/ opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 15.05.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2445 of 2017. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order has been complied with and as such - 1 - Cont. Case (C) No.119 of 2024 2025:JHHC:10048 the present contempt petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - Cont. Case (C) No.119 of 2024