1 APHC010050582019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2302/2019 Between: B Paidi Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KESAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondents in appointing the 6th Respondent as Senior Mate in the place of the Petitioner as highly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the Circular No.567/EGS(FA)/2016 dated 11.03.2016 and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the Petitioner as Senior Mate with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders……” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 2 3. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 4 and 5 would submit that the cause of action does not survive in this matter, hence, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.03.2025 ARR 3 93 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2302/2019 Dt.17.03.2025 ARR