Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57811 (AP)

Smt. Dega Ratnamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37969/2018 · 2025-10-26

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010784662018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 37969/2018 Between: 1. SMT. DEGA RATNAMMA, W/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NARSAIAHGUNTA STREET, GUDURU,S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, NELLORE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GUDUR, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not allowing the Petitioner to complete the construction being made an extent of 48 sq. Yards in Sy.No.1752/2 of Gudur, by virtue of sanction being made by the District Collector, SPSR Nellore District, though there is a direction of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.33952/2018, dt. 20-09-2018, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to consequently direct the Respondents VS,J W.P No.37969 of 2018 2 No. 2 and 3 not to interfere with the construction being made by the Petitioner in an extent of 48 sq. Yards in Sy.No.1752/2 of Gudur, SPSR Nellore District, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 and 3 not to interfere with the construction being made by the Petitioner in an extent of 48 sq. Yards in Sy.No.1752/2 of Gudur, SPSR Nellore District, in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave by condoning the delay in filing of the counter affidavit and allow the same to come on record else this respondent will suffer irreparable loss and injury and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) VS,J W.P No.37969 of 2018 3 The Court made the following Order: Today when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:27.10.2025 Ksj