APHC010437422021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26907 OF 2021 Between: 1. N NARAYANA REDDY, S/o. Late N. Chinnapa Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 2. N. Venkata Ranga Reddy, S/o. Late N. Chinnapa Redd years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. N. Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. N. Obula Reddy, S/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 5. N. Yasodamma, W/o. S. Ramana Reddy, Aged abou Cultivation, R/o. Vonchinreddypalli Village, 0.D.C. Mandal, Anantapur District. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26907 OF 2021 1. N NARAYANA REDDY, S/o. Late N. Chinnapa Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 2. N. Venkata Ranga Reddy, S/o. Late N. Chinnapa Reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. N. Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. N. Obula Reddy, S/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, 5. N. Yasodamma, W/o. S. Ramana Reddy, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Vonchinreddypalli Village, 0.D.C. Mandal, Anantapur ...Petitioners AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. N NARAYANA REDDY, S/o. Late N. Chinnapa Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla y, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla 3. N. Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla 4. N. Obula Reddy, S/o. Late N. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, t 37 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Vonchinreddypalli Village, 0.D.C. Mandal, Anantapur ...Petitioners 2 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Circle Inspector, Gorantla, Anantapur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Gorantla Police Station, Gorantla, Anantapur District. 5. M Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o. Majjiga Gangi Reddy, Aged 71 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District.6. 6. M Venkata Ranga Reddy, S/o. M. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 47 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 7. M Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. M. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 43 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. 8. M Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. M. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 40 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Guntipalli Village, H/o. Vanavolu, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in taking appropriate action in pursuant to the petitioner's representation Dt.04.10.2021 for providing police protection so as to implement the judgment and decree passed in 0.S.No.104 of 2010, Dt.05.11.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda for 3 protection of decreetal property in Sy.No.626-10 to an extent of Ac.2-12 cents situated at Vanavolu Village Polam, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents no.2 to 4 to provide police protection in respect of decreetal property in pursuant to the judgment and decree passed in 0.S.No.104 of 2010, Dt.05.11.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents no.2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation Dt.04.10.2021 for providing police protection so as to implement the judgment and decree passed in 0.S.No.104 of 2010, Dt.05.11.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda for protection of decreetal property in Sy.No.626-10 to an extent of Ac.2-12 cents situated at Vanavolu Village Polam, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioners: KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26907 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in taking appropriate action in pursuant to the petitioner's representation Dt.04.10.2021 for providing police protection so as to implement the judgment and decree passed in 0.S.No.104 of 2010, Dt.05.11.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda for protection of decreetal property in Sy.No.626-10 to an extent of Ac.2-12 cents situated at Vanavolu Village Polam, Gorantla Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents no.2 to 4 to provide police protection in respect of decreetal property in pursuant to the judgment and decree passed in 0.S.No.104 of 2010, Dt.05.11.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda and pass such.…” 2. Heard Sri Kata Sambasiva Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to make a fresh representation, as and when required, in light of the Judgment and Decree dated 05.11.2019 passed in O.S.No.104 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would also submits that the petition may be disposed of by recording the said submission. 5 5. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the police as and when required, so long as the Judgment and Decree dated 05.11.2019 in O.S.No.104 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda, remains in force and in their favor. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025 KKV 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 127 W.P.No.26907 of 2021 Dated: 27.10.2025 KKV