Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57802 (CHH)

NAVEEN KUMAR GEHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1160/2022 · 2025-10-29

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52933-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1160 of 2022 Naveen Kumar Gehi S/o Hemandas Gehi, Aged About 39 Years R/o Behind Pujari Petrol Pump, Ring Road No. 1, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Mahila Thana Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. ABC D/o Xyz Nill ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.10.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “It is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR No.- 52/2022 dated 27/2/22 (Annexure P-1) for offence JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.31 10:44:35 +0530 2 u/s 376, 376 (2) (n) of IPC which is a gross abuse of process of law, illegal and against the provision of law and thus, liable to be quashed in the interest of justice. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the charges have been framed against the petitioner by the trial Court concerned and the case is fixed for recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti