Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57802 (AP)

Gandi Prabhakar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26887/2021 · 2025-10-26

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010442662021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26887 OF 2021 Between: 1. Gandi Prabhakar, S/o George, aged about 69 years, R/o Polakampadu Karakatta, Undavalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur distrit, Andhra Pradesh. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rpd. by its Principal Secreta of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, AP. 2. The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District, AP 3. The Superintendent of Police Urban, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pradesh. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. The Tahsildar, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur Di IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26887 OF 2021 1. Gandi Prabhakar, S/o George, aged about 69 years, R/o Polakampadu Karakatta, Undavalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur distrit, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rpd. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, AP. 2. The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District, AP 3. The Superintendent of Police Urban, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, Andhra 7. The Tahsildar, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, AP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Gandi Prabhakar, S/o George, aged about 69 years, R/o Polakampadu Karakatta, Undavalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur distrit, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner ry, Department 3. The Superintendent of Police Urban, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, Andhra 8. Gandi Raju, S/o Prabhakara Rao, aged about 36 years, R/ D.No. 3-380, Polakumpadu Karakatta, Undavalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur Dist, AP-522501 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to pass a Writ Order or order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the n action of the 6th respondent in not implementing the 5th respondent's order passed under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 vide its order dated 27-6- 2019, in Case No. 3008-3/19-G to evict the 8th respondent (along with his family) from the petitioner's house and handover the same to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 6th respondents to take action in terms of the order in Case No. 3008-3/19-G, dated 27-6-2019 in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim order, directing the 6th respondent to take action in terms of the order in Case No. 3008-3/ 19-G, dated 27-6-2019 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26887 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to pass a Writ Order or order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the n action of the 6th respondent in not implementing the 5th respondent's order passed under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 vide its order dated 27-6-2019, in Case No. 3008-3/19- G to evict the 8th respondent (along with his family) from the petitioner's house and handover the same to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 6th respondents to take action in terms of the order in Case No. 3008-3/19-G, dated 27-6-2019 in accordance with law and pass....” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 4. As the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date 27.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 328 W.P.No.26887 of 2021 Dt.27.10.2025 KKV