Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57792 (CHH)

SURAJ PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3260/2025 · 2025-10-29

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52985 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3260 of 2025 Suraj Pandey S/o Late Kamod Pandey Aged About 29 Years R/o Raghu Vihar, Ashok Nagar Sarkanda, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 30.10.2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 29.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 4598 of 2024, while rejecting the bail to the applicant, namely, Suraj Pandey had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on two occasions also this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 29.07.2024. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 4. The learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 06.10.2025 has requested for grant of two months additional time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from the perusal of the PUD that the Presiding OfÏcer was deputed for duty at the High Court on the occasion of the Silver Jubilee Function, and thereafter, the Dussehra vacation commenced, due to which the case could not be disposed of within the stipulated time. Furthermore, the prosecution has requested additional time to secure the presence of the remaining witnesses, which has necessitated the present request for extension of time for two months. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed before this Court that a further period of two months may kindly be granted for the proper disposal of the case. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal