BALRAJ SINGH ALIAS BALRAJ SINGH DHILLON AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/26707/2025 · 2025-09-10
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57788 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57788 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26707 of 2025 (O & M)
Date of decision: 10.09.2025 Balraj Singh @ Barlaj Singh Dhillon and ors.
…... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and ors.
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Savreet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Divijay Nagpal, Advocate, for Mr. Mabjot Gujral, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 15 dated 16.01.2025 under Sections 333, 115(2), 3(5), 238 of BNS, registered at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). Vide orders dated 16.05.2025 and 25.07.2025 this Court had
directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid
order dated 16.05.2025 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the orders dated 16.05.2025 and 25.07.2025 respectively passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot and as per the report dated SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.10 22:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
::2:: 26.08.2025 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot, accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No.15 dated 16.01.2025 under Sections 333, 115(2), 3(5), 238 of BNS, registered at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein.
Petition stands disposed of.
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE September 10, 2025 sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.10 22:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh