Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57780 (KAR)

SRI NAGESH N v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/13213/2024 · 2025-11-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47718 WP No. 13213 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 13213 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGESH N S/O NADANNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT KITHINAGEDDE SIBINKERE POST THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AMBEDKAR ABHIVRUDHI NIGAMA V.V.TOWER, 9TH AND 10TH FLOORS VIDHANA VEEDI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA - 577 201. 3. DISTRICT MANAGER DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ABHIVRUDHI NIGAMA, RANGANATHA NILAYA A BLOCK, 6TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47718 WP No. 13213 of 2024 4. THE TAHSILDAR THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, THIRTHAHALLI, SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 10.11.2021 VIDE ANNX-F AND CONSEQUENTLY TO GRANT ALL THE BENEFITS AS PRAYED THEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. S.V.Girikumar, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 3. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.2 and 4. 3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47718 WP No. 13213 of 2024 (a) Issue Writ of Mandamus directing the consider respondents to representation of the the petitioner dtd.10.11.2021, vide ANNEXURE-F and consequently to grant all the benefits as prayed therein; and (b) Pass such any other order/s, relief/s, as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the above case, in the interest of justice and equity. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner on 10.11.2021 at Annexure-F for grant of financial assistance on account of communication dated 19.06.2021 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, has not been considered despite a long lapse of time. 5. Whenever, any representation is submitted to the official respondent, it is required for the same to be considered and necessary orders to be passed either accepting or rejecting the request within a reasonable period of time. 6. Needless to say, if an order of rejection is passed, the same would have to be accompanied by reasons. Neither having been done, I pass the following: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47718 WP No. 13213 of 2024 ORDER i) The writ petition is allowed. ii) A mandamus is issued directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.11.2021 at Annexure-F within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27