APHC010050282009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI BS FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 11 OF 2009 Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the Order and Decree dated 27.06.2008 in F.C.O.P No. 15 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. Between: P. Chandrasekhar Reddy, S/o. P. Venkatarami Reddy, Aged about years, Occ: Business R/o. D.No. 20-183, Mosque Road, Mittur, Chittoor ...Appellant/Petitioner 40 AND P.Mohana, W/o. P. Chandrasekhar Reddy, aged about 28 D.No. 16-2-302, Vallabhai Lane, Tirupathi. years, R/o. ...Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri R Chandra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri O Udaya Kumar The Court made the following: APHC010050282009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] 'c FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL [FCA) NO: 11/2009 Between: 1.P. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/0. P. VENKATARAMI REDDY, BUSINESS R/0. D.NO. 20-183, MOSQUE ROAD, MITTUR, ...APPELLANT AND 1.P MOHANA, W/o. P. Chandrasekhar Reddy, R/o. D.No. 16-2-302, Vallabhai Lane, Tirupathi. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section lA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 422 OF 2008 against orders Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 92 days in preferring appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1.R CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 2 f THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.11 of 2009 JUDGMENTiTPer Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Mr. R.Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant represents that during pendency of the appeal, the matter is settled amicably between the parties out of Court and no further adjudication is required in the present appeal. 2. The statement of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record. 3. In view of the above, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JjQINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI (^OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court - cum - V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi Chittoor District (with records) ^One CC to Sri R Chandra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri O Udaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Stu sree -r»^ HIGH COURT DATED:29/08/2025 JUDGMENT FCA NO. 11 OF 2009 DISMISSING THE FCA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS