Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57768 (KAR)

SRI T D KISHORE BABU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11129/2020 · 2025-07-15

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26054 WP No. 11129 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11129 OF 2020 (BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.D. KISHORE BABU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE T.N. DAYANANDA GUPTHA, RESIDING AT NO.1012, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 077. 2. SRI D. LINGANNA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.1015, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 077. 3. SMT R.P. SAVITHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, D/O M. PAPAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.1055, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 040. REPRESENTED BY HER GPA SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, AGED 73 YEARS, W/O M.PAPAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.1055, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 077. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26054 WP No. 11129 of 2020 4. K A JAYAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O.LATE AMRUTHAIAH, RERESIDING AT NO.1016, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 040. 5. SMT. C.H. PAULIN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O C.H. LOKANADHA RAO, RESIDING AT NO.1048, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, THANKISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 077. 6. CHERUKURI LOKANADHA RAO AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE C.H. VENATESHWARA RAO, RESIDING AT NO.1048, 6TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, TANISANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 077. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RITHISH D. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26054 WP No. 11129 of 2020 BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY TS COMMISSIONER. 3. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHANDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOATE FOR R2; SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-ISSUE DIRECTION TO BDA TO FORTHWITH PROVIDE THE BASIC AMENITIES VIZ, UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE, ROADS, WATER SUPPLY TO ARKAVATHI VI BLOCK LAYOUT (THANISANDRA) WHERE THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the petition, the grievance of the petitioners has stood redressed. In that light, the petition would - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26054 WP No. 11129 of 2020 not survive for consideration and to that effect, memo for withdrawal has been filed. The memo so filed reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioners respectfully submit as follows: The grievance of the petitioners has been substantially redressed by the second respondent. In view of the same the petitioners seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition. WHEREFORE, the petitioners respectfully pray that this the above writ petition may be kindly be disposed off as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT:BHK