Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57767 (AP)

M.S. Infra, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15940/2025 · 2025-10-26

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010035642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 15940 OF 2025 Between: 1. M.S. Infra,, D.No. 1-3-549-11, Chenna Reddy Colony, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.D.Srikanth Reddy. 2. D.Srikanth Reddy, S/o. D. Rami Reddy, Aged about 46 years, Occ Business, M.S.Infra, D.No.1-3-549-11, Chenna Reddy Colony, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Finance Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The Managing Director, AP Greening and Beautification Corporation (APGBC), Plot No.30, Road.No.4, Sector 4, Lotus land mark,Ayodhya Nagar, Kedarishwarpet, Vijayawada - 520003. 4. The Zonal Manager, South Zone, AP Greening and Beautification Corporation (APGBC), Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: K NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: J DILEEP KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Naveen Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the amount claimed by the Writ Petitioners has been paid by the Respondents and no further consideration is necessary in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No Order as to Costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 27.10.2025 JKS 106 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 15940 OF 2025 27.10.2025 JKS