Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57763 (KAR)

SRI K A RAJANI KUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1795/2023 · 2025-09-09

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35550 CRL.P No. 1795 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1795 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI K A RAJANI KUMAR S/O SHRIKANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT 103/1-1, HOUSE NO.2, BIDARE AGRAHARA @ CHENNAGENAHALLI, VIRGONAGAR, BANGALORE-560049 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAREDDY K V, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KADUGODI POLICE STATION, REP BY ITS SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE-560001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.07.2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE RURAL, AND AT BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.5331/2017. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35550 CRL.P No. 1795 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. Vide order dated 11.06.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting a week's time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3