Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57762 (KAR)

SRI LAKSHMAMMA, v. SMT. SEETHAMMA

WP/33107/2024 · 2025-07-29

Jyoti Mulimani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.33107/2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN 1 . SRI LAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT, SRINIVASA SAWMILL, GONIKOPPA ROAD, PRIYAPATNA TOWN AND TALUK MYSORE …PETITIONER/S (BY SRI./SMT.: MAPARI LAXMIKANT, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT. SEETHAMMA W/O LATE RAMASHEETTY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT, KUMBARAGERE, PIRIYAPATNNA TOWN AND TALUK, MYSORE. …RESPONDENT/S THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 02.06.2023 PASSED ON O.S.NO.300/2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT PERIYAPTANA (ANNEXURE-E) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI W.P.NO.33107/2024 2 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI) When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, a duty owes on the counsel on record to appear before the Court. However, in the interest of justice and as a last chance, a week’s time, is granted to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied with within a week’s time. The Writ Petition stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : JK COMPARED BY : JK COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR