APHC010569082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29373/2025 Between: 1.GOGASANI PITCHAIAH, S/O LATE SURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O JANAPADU VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDALAM, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARSARAOPETA. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA PS, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PIDUGURALLA PS, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5.SRI MERLAPAKA MOHAN, WORKING AS SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PIDUGURALLA PS, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6.GOGASANI SANJEEV, S/O LATE SURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O JANAPADU VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDALAM, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J.V.PHANIDUTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29373 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent officials especially respondent Nos.3 to 5 in interfering with the civil disputes between me and the unofficial respondents, repeatedly calling us to their offices forcing us for unlawful settlement of the disputes and threatening us with implication of false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to articles 14, 20, 21 & 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently COMMAND the respondent officials not to interfere in the civil dispute between me and the unofficial respondents in the interest of justice and pass …” 2. Heard Sri J.V.Phaniduth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that basing on the complaint of one Gogasani Sanjeev, dated 21.10.2025, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry and no crime was registered against the petitioner. 4 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law, in case any crime is registered. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.10.2025. SAB 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29373 of 2025 Dated.24.10.2025 SAB 78