Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57753 (AP)

Mr. Chaganti Sambi Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22040/2021 · 2025-10-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010362392021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. MR. CHAGANTI SAMBI REDDY,, S/O. HANUMA REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. 3- MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDEN GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. MR SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC.SUB POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. BURRAMUKKU SIVA REDDY, S/O. RATHHA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. VR APARTMENTS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22040 OF 2021 MR. CHAGANTI SAMBI REDDY,, S/O. HANUMA REDDY, AGED 60 -17, KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. MR SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC.SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA BURRAMUKKU SIVA REDDY, S/O. RATHHA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. VR APARTMENTS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MR. CHAGANTI SAMBI REDDY,, S/O. HANUMA REDDY, AGED 60 17, KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI ...PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. T OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. MR SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA BURRAMUKKU SIVA REDDY, S/O. RATHHA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. VR APARTMENTS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22040 OF 2021 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents No. 4 and 5 in calling the Petitioner to the Respondent No.4 Police Station basing on the alleged letter made by the Respondent No.6 to the Respondent No.3 under Spandana Programme as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Mr. V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Home for the Respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the Respondent/ Police never called the Petitioner to the Police Station and never interfered with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 at any point of time. 4. Recording the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Respondent/ Police are directed to follow the due process of law, if any complaint against the Petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.10.2025 KK