Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57752 (PNJ)

RAJ KAPOOR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13954/2025 · 2025-05-15

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-13954-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132 RAJ KAPOOR STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Rakesh Sobti for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to with effect from the date his junior has been promoted 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decis stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the respondents representation, dated respondent/Director speaking/reasoned months. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: RAJ KAPOOR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Foreman Instructor from the date his junior has been promoted Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case pending representation, dated 06 specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 06.02.2025, will be decided by Director General, Technical Education /reasoned order in accordance with law within IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13954-2025 Date of Decision: 15.05.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing promote the petitioner to the post of Foreman Instructor from the date his junior has been promoted. petitioner submits that grievance raised ion before the respondents. At this atisfied in case third respondent is directed to 6.02.2025, Annexure P-4, in a Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, /State and submits that the pending will be decided by the third Technical Education, by passing a order in accordance with law within a period of three directing promote the petitioner to the post of Foreman Instructor submits that grievance raised ion before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, the pending third by passing a three Aman Dua 2025.05.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-13954-2025 5. petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. 7. officer concerned shall pay costs of 15.05.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.05.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document