IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H. P. SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 734 OF 2022 BETWEEN 1 . SMT. HAZEERA BI, W/O AMEER JAN, D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT HIREHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. 2 . SMT. JAKEERA, W/O MAHABOOB PASHA, D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT HIREHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. 3 . SMT. PARVEEN, WIFE OF SYED SHAMEER, D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, …2 RSA NO.734/2022 2 AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR LAKSHMI TALKIES, BEHIND MIRJI PETROL BUNK, BATAWADI, TUMAKURU - 572 102. 4 . SMT. JABEENA, W/O ALLA BAKASH, D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT HIREHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 201. 5 . SMT. SALMA, W/O AZAZ PASHA, D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT HIREHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt. : FAYAZ SAB B. G., ADVOCATE) …3 RSA NO.734/2022 3 AND 1 . SMT. SABEER KHANUM, W/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANGAPURA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. 2 . SRI MUNAWAR, S/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, RESIDING AT SANGAPURA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. 3 . SRI ANWAR, S/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM SAB, RESIDING AT SANGAPURA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 201. …RESPONDENT/S REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2021 PASSED IN RA.No.41/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU, DISMISSING THE …4 RSA NO.734/2022 4 APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.07.2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.1524/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU. This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:- ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has paid the cost of Rs.500/- today in the office. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that there are 10 office objections and except payment of cost, office objections are not complied. Hence, on further cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at registry, another time of two weeks is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied within two weeks, the appeal will be dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE …5 RSA NO.734/2022 5 NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 25.06.2025, cost not paid and the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: VS C By: GS Ty Date: 29.11.2025 C Date: 04.12.2025