Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57751 (CHH)

M/S AUTO FARM AGENCIES v. GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH

FA/638/2018 · 2025-07-02

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2024:CGHC:30583-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 638 of 2018 M/s Auto Farm Agencies Through Proprietor G.K. Jaiswal, S/o Late J.P. Jaiswal, Through Mandapam, Tifra, Police Station, Sirgitti, Tehsil And District Bilaspur . (Plaintiff), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1. Government Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, Police Station, Civil Lines, Tehsil And District Bilaspur., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2- Chhattisgarh Rajya Antyavyawsayi Vitt Evam Vikas Nigam Maryadit Through Managing Director, B-09, Sector - 5, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3- Chhattisgarh Rajya Antyavyawsayi Vitt Evam Vikas Nigam Maryadit, Through Chief Executive Officer, Composite Building, Bilaspur, Police Station, Civil Lines, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4- Manohar Singh S/o Rannu Singh R/o Village Nagwahi Ghurdewapara, Post Silpahri, Tehsil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5- Rajman Singh S/o Budhhu Singh R/o Village Andda, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Defendants) ... Respondents Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2024.08.14 18:20:13 +0530 2 / 2 For Appellant : None For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.2 & 3: Mr. Yashraj Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For Respondents No.4 & 5: Mr. T.R. Patel, Advocate (Division Bench) Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (13.08.2024) Smt. Rajani Dubey, J. 1. Today none appeared on behalf of the appellant even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round, it appears that the appellant is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge Shubham