1 2025:CGHC:59714 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3726 of 2025 Beena Sharma W/o Shishir Prakash Sharma Aged About 37 Years (Wrongly Written As Veena Sharma In The Impugned Orders), R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. Prakashnath Sharma (Died And Deleted) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 19-08-2025 2. Smt. Kishori Prakash Sharma W/o Prakashnath Sharma Aged About 72 Years R/o Shivnath Colony, Gali No. 1, Dist. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 3. Dr. Shishir Prakash Sharma S/o Prakashnath Sharma R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 4. Piyush Prakash Sharma S/o Prakashnath Sharma Aged About 48 Years R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 5. Smt. Pratishtha Sharma W/o Piyush Prakash Sharma R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 6. Smt. Gunjan Jha D/o Prakashnath Sharma, W/o Prasun Jha Aged About 44 Years R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 7. Prasun Jha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sector-1, Road No. 8, Block No. 13/b, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondents : Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.12.11 10:47:34 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 09.12.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 19.08.2025, passed in CRR No. 1353/2024, while disposed of the same had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the entire proceedings in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from production of the certified copy of this order without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, District - Durg (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 15.11.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from the perusal of the PUD that in the present case, due to the filing of several interim applications by the applicant and the respondents, and due to the demise of the mother of the respondents’ senior advocate. Hence, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time. Therefore, he prays for grant of further time to conclude the same. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of one month from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti