Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57745 (KAR)

MR SANJAY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/14112/2025 · 2025-11-18

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14112 OF 2025 [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)] BETWEEN: MR SANJAY S/O SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. CHITRAHALLI, TALYA HOBI, HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 526. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN C., ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHITRAHALLI GATE POLICE STATION, CHITRAHALLI - 577 526. REPRESENTED BY THE S.P.P., HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B., ADDL. SPP FOR RESPODNENT AND SRI. HARISH N.R., ADVOCATE FOR DEFACTO COMPLAINANT) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.130/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 109(1), 115(2), 352, 49, 3(5) OF BNS, 2023, CHITRAHALLI GATE Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 POLICE STATION, ON THE COMPLIANT OF LATHA, NOW PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC, HOLALKERE, CHITRADURGA. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to grant bail in Crime No.130/2025 of Chitrahalli Gate Police Station, registered for offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 49 read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent - State who is assisted by learned counsel for victim/injured. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that, accused No.2 has been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court. The incident has taken place on 04.09.2025 and complaint has been lodged on 09.09.2025 and there is a delay in filing the complaint. The injured has been admitted on the next day of the incident i.e., on 05.09.2025. A Civil suit has been filed by the father of complainant in O.S.No.166/2025 on 06.09.2025 against the father of this petitioner and another. There is a Civil dispute between the accused persons and the injured and their family members which led to the quarrel, where under, the injured had sustained injuries. There is a delay in recording the statement of eye witnesses. As the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. With these, he prayed to allow the petition. 4. Per contra, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent who is assisted by learned counsel for victim/injured would contend that, the wound certificate indicates that, the injured has sustained - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 grievous injuries. The injured is still in the hospital taking treatment and he is under coma. The injury has been caused with a machete on the forehead of the injured and it is a vital part. The machete has been seized at the instance of this petitioner. The injured has taken treatment in Government hospital on the day of incident itself i.e., 04.09.2025 and subsequently he has been referred to higher center. She further submits that, there are six (6) eye witnesses to the incident who are cited as C.W.5 to C.W.10. The charge sheet materials show that, there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner for offences alleged against him. One of the offences alleged against the petitioner is punishable with imprisonment for life. If the petitioner is granted bail, there are chances of he committing similar offence and threatening the prosecution witnesses. With these, she prayed for dismissal of the petition. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing for parties, the Court has perused the FIR, complaint, charge sheet and other materials placed on record. 6. The case of the prosecution is that, on 04.09.2025 at about 09.30 p.m. C.W.4 went to the house of C.W.7 and when he was talking with regard to the partition in the family properties, at that time, accused No.1 came there and abused C.W.4 in a filthy language and assaulted him with hands and legs and thereafter, took machete which was there and assaulted on the forehead of C.W.4 on his right hand and other parts and caused grievous injuries. At the time of incident, accused No.2 was instigating accused No.1. As per the wound certificate issued by Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, the injuries sustained by C.W.4 are grievous injuries. The remarks mentioned in the wound certificate indicates that, there is a traumatic brain injury, right frontal hemorrhagic contusion. The injured is still taking treatment and he is stated to be in coma. The assault made by this petitioner - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47545 CRL.P No. 14112 of 2025 is with machete on the forehead of the injured and it is a vital part. The delay in filing the complaint has been explained in the averments of the complaint. The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable with imprisonment for life. If the petitioner is granted bail, there are chances of he committing similar offence and tampering the prosecution witnesses. 7. Considering all the above aspects, the petitioner has not made out any grounds for grant of bail. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12