Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57743 (PNJ)

KEWAL KRISHAN BAJAJ v. KAILASH CHAND

CRR/1495/2019 · 2025-02-03

Lok Adalat Bench

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DAILY LOK ADALAT 502 Present: hearing i.e. 22.11.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It further transpires that the petitioner was awarded sentence of one year simple imprisonment and to pay compens Rs.50 lacs. The sentence of the petitioner was not suspended and that being so, counting from the date of judgment of the learned Sessions Judge i.e. 03.06.2019, the petitioner must have undergone the sentence awarded by the learned Magi learned Sessions Judge. interest in the present proceedings. As regards recovery of compensation, the respondent has sufficient remedies available under the provisions record with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, if need be, by moving an appropriate application. parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of the petitioner. 03.02.2025 NainaRajput DAILY LOK ADALAT CRR-1495-2019 (O&M) KEWAL KRISHAN BAJAJ VS KAILASH CHAND None for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate with Kailash Chand-respondent in person. * * * * Nobody appears for the petitioner. It transpires from the record that on the last dat hearing i.e. 22.11.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It further transpires that the petitioner was awarded sentence of one year simple imprisonment and to pay compens Rs.50 lacs. The sentence of the petitioner was not suspended and that being so, counting from the date of judgment of the learned Sessions Judge i.e. 03.06.2019, the petitioner must have undergone the sentence awarded by the learned Magi learned Sessions Judge. This being the situation, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in the present proceedings. As regards recovery of compensation, the respondent has sufficient remedies available under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure to recover the same. In the circumstances, the revision petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, if need be, by moving an appropriate application. A copy of this order be given to parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of the petitioner. ( 03.02.2025 BENCH NO.3 KEWAL KRISHAN BAJAJ VS KAILASH CHAND Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate with respondent in person. for the petitioner. It transpires from the record that on the last date of hearing i.e. 22.11.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It further transpires that the petitioner was awarded sentence of one year simple imprisonment and to pay compensation amounting to Rs.50 lacs. The sentence of the petitioner was not suspended and that being so, counting from the date of judgment of the learned Sessions Judge i.e. 03.06.2019, the petitioner must have undergone the sentence awarded by the learned Magistrate and affirmed by the This being the situation, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in the present proceedings. As regards recovery of compensation, the respondent has sufficient remedies available under of Code of Criminal Procedure to recover the same. In the circumstances, the revision petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, if need be, by A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of (G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER e of hearing i.e. 22.11.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It further transpires that the petitioner was awarded sentence of one ation amounting to Rs.50 lacs. The sentence of the petitioner was not suspended and that being so, counting from the date of judgment of the learned Sessions Judge i.e. 03.06.2019, the petitioner must have undergone the strate and affirmed by the This being the situation, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in the present proceedings. As regards recovery of compensation, the respondent has sufficient remedies available under In the circumstances, the revision petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, if need be, by learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of ) PRESIDENT ) MEMBER NAINA KATHIAT 2025.02.07 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document