CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY v. THE LABOUR OFFICER AND
WP/60295/2014 · 2025-10-13
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40320 WP No. 60295 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 60295 OF 2014 (L-MW) BETWEEN:
CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT MYSORE AND BRANCH OFFICE AT HUNSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. …PETITIONER (ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION AUTHORITY UNDER SEC. 20 OF MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1958 MYSORE DIVISION, MYSORE-570004.
2.
THE LABOUR INSPECTOR K.R.NAGAR, K.R.NAGAR CIRCLE, MYSORE DISTRICT-570004.
3.
MR.BADRI MADHUSUDHAN & SRINIVASAN CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS #461/F18 1ST FLOOR, PUTTU PLAZA, M.G.ROAD, MYSORE-570 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA K.R., AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. RAGHURAM CADAMBI, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40320 WP No. 60295 of 2014
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. Sri.Rajendra.K.R., AGA for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 12.01.2024, on that day, in view of demise of counsel Sri.Harikrishna S.Holla, Court notice was issued to the petitioner. It's been one and a half year, the petitioner has not engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40320 WP No. 60295 of 2014
petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged.
SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
KMV,TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16