RUBEENA AKHTER v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/448/2013 · 2025-02-24
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No. 54
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. :- SWP 448/2013
Rubeena Akhter …..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Arsha Sharma, Advocate
Vs
State and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Assisting counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 24.02.2025
Record reveals that with the efflux of time, the petitioner has become over aged and the relief which has been claimed in the instant petition cannot be extended. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous along with connected application(s), if any.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 24.02.2025 Rahul