APHC010487122024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4182/2024 Between: 1. SREENIVASA CONSTRUCTIONS, MANAGING PARTNER B. SRENIVASA, S/O. BHASKAR NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OC CONTRACTOR, R/O.D.NO. 11270/ 1,SOCIETY COLONY, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. (RL) 2. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.(R2) 3. NAGARAJU NAIDU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PIU DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. (R3) 4. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (R5 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble High Court dated 28.03.2024 passed in W.P.No. 9220 of 2023 by the Lordships JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4182/2024 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.9220 of 2023. 2. Sri Chaitanya Palisetty, learned counsel representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 27th October, 2025 RKS