Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5773 (RAJ)

PREETI LATA SINGH W/O JAI SINGH JATAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1921/2025 · 2025-02-04

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1921/2025 Preeti Lata Singh W/o Jai Singh Jatav ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon the order dated 15.01.2025 passed in SBCWP No.906/2025 titled as Dr. Jagdish Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan, has submitted that the petitioner therein was granted relaxation qua joining. Therefore, the petitioner herein is ought to be given the same interim protection. It is further submitted that petitioner has the responsibility of a child aged approximately 2 years and is unwell as on date. In light of the same, the petitioner seeks an extension of relaxation for 15 days qua joining. Heard. Issue notices. On the directions of the Court, notices are accepted by Mr. Sankalp Vijay on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG for respondents. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised an objection howsoever, submitted that though the interim protection granted in the afore-relied is squarely applicable qua the petitioner herein, (2 of 2) [CW-1921/2025] but the tenure of said interim protection/relaxation qua joining is only applicable till 30.01.2025. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the exceptional circumstances, this Court in the interest of justice, directs the respondent to grant 15 days relaxation to the petitioner qua joining, thereby petitioner is directed to join the duties on 24.02.2025 at the new place of posting. It is made clear the instant matter shall not be treated as precedence as the same is passed considering the exceptional circumstances. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /340