IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.812 of 2023 B.M., New India Assurance Co., Ltd. …. Appellant Mr. S. K. Ghose, Advocate -versus- Saraswati Tarai & Ors. …. Respondents Mr. S.K. Dash, Adv. for Resp. Nos.1 to 3 CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 14.07.2025 I.A. No.1784 of 2025 10. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. This I.A. has been filed seeking modification of the order dtd.20.06.2025. 4. It is contended that the impugned judgment was passed by the learned 8th MACT-cum-Addl. District Judge, Aska, Ganjam vide judgment dtd.18.05.2023 in M.A.C. No.25 of 2018. But taking into account the wrong committed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant in giving a wrong date as well as the case number and name of the Court in the index page of the brief, the same has been typed out in Para-3 of order dtd.20.06.2025. 5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the I.A observe that in Para-3 of the order dtd.20.06.2025 the date of judgment and the case number with the name of the Court be corrected and read as “18.05.2023”, so passed by the “learned 8th MACT-cum-Addl. District Judge, Aska, Ganjam in M.A.C. No.25 of 2018”. 5.1. Since it is contended that the compensation amount has already been deposited in the meantime, the same be disbursed in terms of the order as directed. 6. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat