Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57720 (KAR)

SRI.R. SIDDARAMAIAH @ SIDDRAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27388/2025 · 2025-09-26

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39034 WP No. 27388 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 27388 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. R. SIDDARAMAIAH @ SIDDRAMAIAH S/O LATE RAMELINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O HUNJANALU (AT AND POST), KALLAMLBELLA HOBLI, SHIRA TQ., DISTRICT TUMKUR - 572101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO ISSUE SAGUVALI CHIT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.63, MEASURING 2.15 ACRES, OF HUNJANALU VILLAGE, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SHIRA TALUKA, TUMKUR DISTRICT, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/08/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39034 WP No. 27388 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for both the respondents. 2. Having regard to the communication dated 02.10.2021 At Annexure-F made by the Tahsildar, Sira Taluk to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board that the petitioner was in unauthorised cultivation of 02 acres and 15 guntas of land in Survey No.63 of Hunjanalu Village, Kallambella Hobli, Sira Taluk and therefore, the petitioner is entitled for compensation, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate directions to the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE MCR