APHC010813242015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 671/2015 Between: 1. MORU DHANMJAYA, S/O LATE NELABALUDU, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O D NO.1-77A, KOVVADALANKA, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MANDALA NAGA RAJU, W/O BHASKAR RAO, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O D NO.2-86B, KOVVADALANKA, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, KAIKALURU JCJC. 2. KONA SRINIVASA RAO, W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O D NO.9-147, KOVVADALANKA, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, KAIKALURU JCJC. ...RESPONDENT(S): to allow the appeal with costs and set aside the order of injunction granted in I.A.No.1304 of 2015 in O.S.No.74/2015 dt.27.08.2015 on the file of the XI Addl Dist Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam and consequently dismiss the said petition for temporary injunction IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 1447 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation and effect of the orders passed in I A.No.1304 of 2015 in O.S.No.74/2015 dt.27.08.2015 on the file of the XI Addl Dist Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam, pending disposal of the appeal. 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.671/2015 IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CMAMP 1536 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend name of the court as XI Additional District Judge, Krishna District at Gudivada, instead of XI Additional District Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam in the prayer portion of the interim order dt. 15/09/2015 passed in CMA.MP.no. 1447 of 2015 in CMA.No. 671 of 2015 and in the affidavit filed in support of the suspension peittion, and memorandum of ground of Appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.671/2015 JUDGMENT: As there was no representation for the appellant on 17.07.2025, the matter was adjourned to 11.09.2025. On 11.09.2025 there was no representation for the appellant. Hence the matter was directed to be listed on 18.09.2025. On 18.09.2025 also there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal” Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J C.M.A.No.671/2015 735 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 671/2015 Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS