322 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VICKY SAHOTA STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. 08.04.2021, registered under Sections Code (Sections Division No.2, Ludhiana same, on the basis of compromise dated 2. The following order was IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: VICKY SAHOTA AND OTHERS V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. B.R. Rana-I, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vipan Kumar Sharma, Advocate for **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. , registered under Sections 323, 341, 148, 149, 506 324, 325, 201, 379 IPC added later on) Division No.2, Ludhiana and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P The following order was passed on “This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the No.63 dated 8.04.2021, registered under Sections 149, 506 of Indian Penal Code added later on) at Police Station basis of compromise dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P2 all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26962-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR for the petitioners. , Advocate for respondents No.2& 3. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No.63 dated 323, 341, 148, 149, 506 of Indian Penal 324, 325, 201, 379 IPC added later on) at Police Station all subsequent proceedings arising out of the .05.2025 (Annexure P-2). passed on 16.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR , registered under Sections 323, 341, 148, of Indian Penal Code (Sections 324, 325, 201 ,379 IPC at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana, on the basis of compromise dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P21) along with bsequent proceedings arising therefrom, including the HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26962-2025 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and 341, 148, 149, 506 of 2025 2 charge sheet dated 29.09.2022 (Annexure P 13.09.2023 (Annexure P-5). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Godara, Addl. AG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr.Vipan Kumar Sharma on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 is taken on record. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate w or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report r the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.63 dated 08.04.2021, registered under Sections 341, 148, 149, 506 of Indian Penal Code (Sections 324, 325, 201, 379 IPC charge sheet dated 29.09.2022 (Annexure P-4) and order dated At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash accepts notice on behalf of respondent Vipan Kumar Sharma, Advocate accepts notice and 3 and files Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition , registered under Sections 323, (Sections 324, 325, 201, 379 IPC HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26962-2025 added later on) consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 3 added later on) at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Division No.2, Ludhiana and all proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document